Subject: | [OM] Re: 420 and 25/2.8 |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:13:32 -0400 |
I didn't forget. Perhaps it has been discontinued. It is not listed on Canon's USA web site <http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&fcategoryid=154> Chuck Norcutt Andrew Fildes wrote: > You forgot the 1200mm. :-) > > I understand that the non-L wides aren't too good but the 85/1.8 and > 100/2 excellent and 135/2L rather special. Haven't heard much on the > new 200/2 yet. > Andrew Fildes > afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > On 18/07/2008, at 12:51 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > >> Then perhaps you're on the wrong system. I've never tallied the >> Canyon >> primes before but decided to take a look. Here's what's available. > > > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.1/1559 - Release Date: 7/17/2008 > 6:08 PM > > > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] AVG, Brian Gray |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Test, John Hermanson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 420 and 25/2.8, Andrew Fildes |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 420 and 25/2.8, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |