Then perhaps you're on the wrong system. I've never tallied the Canyon
primes before but decided to take a look. Here's what's available.
14/2.8
15/2.8 fisheye
20/2.8
24/1.4 and 2.8
24/3.5 tilt/shift
28/1.8 and 2.8
35/1.4 and 2
45/2.8 tilt/shift
50/1.2, 1.4 and 1.8
50/2.5 macro
60/2.8 macro (EFS only)
65/2.8 macro
85/1.2 and 1.8
90/2.8 tilt/shift
100/2
100/2.8 macro
135/2 and 2.8
180/3.5 macro
200/2 and 2.8
300/2.8 and 4
400/2.8, 4 and 5.6
500/4
600/4
800/5.6
If my counting is correct that's 35 primes with only 7 of them slower
than f/2.8. Those that are slower than f/2.8, well I think you see the
reasons. If you add Sigma to the list you get another 14 to choose
from. I assume Nikon and Pentax have the same story.
Chuck Norcutt
bs.pearce@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Bill Pearce, who thinks that what we need is some good fast primes.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|