Moose,
I recall someone here a few months ago saying the OM-4 (non-T) had a problem
with the film-speed dials that was corrected on the T models. John H.
Mentioned it too. That, and the fact that many 4's have the bad circuit that
eats batteries makes it worth it to me to get the 4T. I know many 4's have
the new circuit, but would still rather have the 4T.
--
Chris Crawford
Photography & Graphic Design
Fort Wayne, Indiana
http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work!
http://www.plumpatrin.com Something the world NEEDS.
On 6/27/08 6:47 PM, "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chris Crawford wrote:
>> I have two of them. .... I do use both of them though so I want to get one
>> for her. I may ask the list if someone wants to sell one in a couple months.
>> I'll have the money to buy one at the end of August.
>>
> Just a reminder. The only functional differences between an OM-4 and a 4T(i)
> are the newer circuit and support for the F280 flash. Yes, the top and bottom
> plates are titanium, instead of brass, but I don't consider that a functional
> difference in my use.
>
> There are a fair number of plain OM-4 bodies around that have had the newer,
> 4T, circuit installed as part of a service. They are generally cheaper and
> often actually have a newer circuit than some 4Ts.
>
> I used to have three of them. One recently went to live with another list
> member. Trying to decide if I don't really only need one, as my taste for film
> has been an OM-1 lately.
>
> Moose
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|