Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Thanks a lot, C.H. - I will search the free version of Neat Image and give it
> a try. A few minutes ago I used Filter >Noise>Reduce Noise in CS3 on a small
> .jpeg done with my 720 SW at a high ISO. Not a magic solution but improved a
> little bit.
>
The NR in CS3 is not even in the same category as the serious NR
applications, of which NeatImage is one. I recommend you simply ignore
CS3 NR, except perhaps for special blur effects, and get a real NR
solution. Like C.H., I use NeatImage, but I'm sure others are also
excellent.
> So, no way to improve dynamic range making different .tiff out of one same
> problematic slide .... pity :-(
>
Sorry, this isn't TV or the movies, no free lunch.
> Well, finally I decided to continue scanning at 16x just because I like to
> spend time and wait for the result :-)
>
Now we are into the TV territory of Monk, not CSI. I know a local doctor
who might be able to help you with that. ;-)
Or is it a Zen thing?
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|