ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Low cost backup

Subject:	[OM] Re: Low cost backup
From:	Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 17 May 2008 08:24:46 -0400

That's OK.  Neither do the physicists.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt

Chris Barker wrote:
>
> I also have a problem with Moose's mixing of metaphors: "quarks ...  
> colours ... spin etc ..."
> 
> But then I haven't a clue what a quark might be.
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Low cost backup, (continued) [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Scott Peden [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Chris Barker [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Moose [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Jez Cunningham [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Chris Barker [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Chris Barker [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Chuck Norcutt <= [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Moose [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Chris Barker [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Chris Crawford [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Jez Cunningham [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Michael Collins [OM] Re: Low cost backup, John Hermanson [OM] Re: Low cost backup, Ian Manners

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: IMG: Approaching storm, Andrew Fildes
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Low cost backup, Chris Barker
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Low cost backup, Chris Barker
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Low cost backup, Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]