Subject: | [OM] Re: What to buy, what to buy. |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 9 May 2008 16:25:52 +1000 |
But, why is it unappealing. That's the difficult bit. If you shoot 6x6, anything but square is unappealing and it's a bugger to buy square paper. If you're into panoramas then 4:1 looks just perfect. I rather like 6x7 myself. I'm not alone. I don't think that there's a paper size for that. 8x10 was the ancient full plate size, which just happened to be close to quarto. 5x7 - a slight trim on half plate, 4x5 is quarter plate. Nothing really matches a 5:4 ratio today, nor is there any particular reason why it should. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 09/05/2008, at 1:16 PM, Mike wrote: > when I lop an unused chunk off from > every A3 sheet because of an unappealing aspect ratio? ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: The Annie Liebowitz Controversy, Andrew Fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: What to buy, what to buy., Jan Steinman |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: What to buy, what to buy., Mike |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: What to buy, what to buy., Ian Nichols |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |