Subject: | [OM] Re: What to buy, what to buy. |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 8 May 2008 22:01:52 +1000 |
Sizes used to be based on the sawn dimension before kiln drying as I understand so that KDHD (kiln dried hardwood) was always undersize by a consistent amount. 2x4 framing never was. The entry seems to confirm this. Scantling dimensions were pretty accurate though as it's more important and often precisely surfaced and shaped (skirtings, architraves) in stable, fine grained hardwoods. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 08/05/2008, at 9:34 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > They have. Closer to 1-1/2 x 3-1/2. And 1/4", 1/2", 5/8" and 3/4" > plywood are no longer those thicknesses. Now (except for hardwood) > shrunk by 1/64 or 1/32 and designated (parenthetically) in those silly > millimeter measurements we normally only use for lens focal lengths. > All the ugly details are here: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timber> > > Chuck Norcutt > > Moose wrote: > >>> >> Not my piece of territory. >>> Or I'll come round your place with a length of 2x4. >>> >> 1 5/8 x 3 5/8, unless they have shrunk again. > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: What to buy, what to buy., Sandy Harris |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Some interesting photography here..., John Hermanson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: What to buy, what to buy., Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: What to buy, what to buy., Jan Steinman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |