Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> <http://www.oyemodern.com/bracelets/wide-focus-cuff-by-re-vision/prod_145.html>
> hasn't been bent. It was a cylinder with a section cut out. ...
Are you sure? The internal dimesions show 65 x 50mm (2.5 x 2"), and that
gap/arc missing doesn't seem enough to effect a 15mm (0.5") change in
top to bottom diameter. This is similar to differences with others, such
as the one I mentioned:
<http://www.oyemodern.com/bracelets/aperture-cuff-by-re-vision/prod_143.html>
which has internal dimensions of 65 x 45mm (2.5 x 1.75"), which actually
a bigger difference not seeming accounted for by the gap.
Aside from the one you linked to, and the one above it at the main menu
for them, they all seem to have had similar "flattening" of their
circles to create a more wrist-fitting shape. This is the "bend" to
which I refer.
Cheers,
Marc
Noosa Heads, Oz
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|