<http://www.oyemodern.com/bracelets/wide-focus-cuff-by-re-vision/prod_145.html>
hasn't been bent. It was a cylinder with a section cut out. Probably
cam slots for the zoom. This one is a focusing helicoid with a section
cut out and has been bent where a section of the threads has been ground
away
<http://www.oyemodern.com/bracelets/lens-thread-cuff-by-re-vision/prod_142.html>
Chuck Norcutt
Marc Lawrence wrote:
> Andrew Fildes wrote:
>> I rather like this one -
>> http://www.oyemodern.com/bracelets/wide-focus-cuff-by-re-vision/
>> prod_145.html
>
> I'm fond of this one:
>
> <http://www.oyemodern.com/bracelets/aperture-cuff-by-re-vision/prod_143.html>
>
>> I've often been fascinated by the clever components. I shall be
>> dumpster diving tomorrow for big, thick lenses!
>> The ideal would be to maintain the original lens identity in some way.
>
> I've never dismantled a lens, so I ask the question, "Wouldn't bending
> the component into the bracelet shape be the difficult part?". I don't
> know, of course, but I am thinking there might be a brittle strength to
> it that might like heating first?
>
> Cheers,
> Marc
> Noosa Heads, Oz
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|