Subject: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:30:08 -0400 |
Right, but do pay attention to the order in which you do them. Chuck Norcutt Moose wrote: > Paul Laughlin wrote: >> And if the satelodge does't coincide with the sidiphyte then the rataset >> won't work. And about now I am so confused that I don't know whether to >> wind my ass or wipe my watch. >> > Both > > Moose > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > > > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OM]Happy Passover/Pesach to those who celebrate it or even heard of it!, John Hudson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: test, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size,, Moose |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size,, Marc Lawrence |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |