Subject: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, |
---|---|
From: | Marc Lawrence <montsnmags@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:20:18 +1000 |
Winsor Crosby wrote: > And the fact that they are dwarfish furblesnotzers matters not a > whit. :-) Besides, furblesnotzers will never match that indefinable something of film's quibblefibs, chemical darkroom's huffinogres, medium format's snobtitties, nor, for that matter, the painter's troglodendrites. Matters not a whit at all! Cheers, Marc Noosa Heads, Oz ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and r, Winsor Crosby |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size,, Winsor Crosby |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size,, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |