ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and res

Subject:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution
From:	Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:17:52 -0700

I am afraid Mr. Rockwell's opinions are not highly prized in most  
quarters. "Reviews" of cameras he has not seen, lack of care in his  
methods, and outrageous hyperbole are the the usual criticisms.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On / April 18, 2008 CE, at 2:39 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> <http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/full-frame-advantage.htm>



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Michael Wong [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby <= [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Wayne Harridge [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Gordon Ross [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Andrew Fildes [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Bill Pearce

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Michael Wong
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Michael Wong
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]