ML Archiv: [OM] Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolu

Subject:	[OM] Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution
From:	Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:39:29 -0400

<http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/full-frame-advantage.htm>

Chuck Norcutt

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt <= [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Michael Wong [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, C.H.Ling [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Wayne Harridge [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Winsor Crosby [OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Gordon Ross

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: When, when, when, Leandro DUTRA
Next by Date:	[OM] [OT] Her name is Irma!, Johan Malmström
Previous by Thread:	[OM] When, when, when, Winsor Crosby
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: Some interesting commentary on sensor size, pixel pitch and resolution, Michael Wong
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]