On an E3 they are both fine. The Sigma is not that small either. On
the E410 that I had before both were a bit unbalanced, but not
excessively.
Cheers,
Nathan
On 18-apr-2008, at 9:21, Richard Man wrote:
> Nathan, how about the size and balance? The PanaLeica looks kind of
> large and that could be deceiving. Does either one balance better
> than the others?
>
> At 10:10 PM 4/17/2008, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I cannot honestly say that I see a huge quality difference between
>> the two lenses. Both are excellent, including at the widest
>> apertures. The Leica may be slightly better at f1.4 but the Sigma is
>> certainly no slouch. It is by far the best Sigma lens I have ever
>> owned, both in terms of performance and build quality (as opposed to
>> all the Sigma zooms I have ever tried, which all felt flimsy). I like
>> Leica glass and am willing to spend the extra, but I would not
>> hesitate to recommend the Sigma.
>
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly,
> please use richard at imagecraft.com)
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
Nathan Wajsman
nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
General photography:
http://www.nathanfoto.com
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.frozenlight.eu
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
Book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/128276
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|