Understood but I have another experience for DX 17-55mm F2.8 which no
vignetting from 28mm ~ 55mm. I may upload the photos and share with you all
tomorrow.
--
Michael
On 16/04/2008, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Why should the vignetting be unexpected? The image circle of this lens
> is only designed to cover the 23.6 x 15.8 mm of the APS-C size sensor
> and not the 24 x 36 mm of your film body. Actually, I'm surprised that
> the vignetting isn't worse. It's simply not designed to do what you're
> trying to do.
>
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Michael Wong wrote:
> > Last month I joined a photography gathering. Somebody who is Nikon DSLR
> > user, I tried his DX 18-200/3.5-5.6G VR lens on my F100 to shoot some
> > samples of film. Unexpected vignetting was found at 200mm too. It's
> > impossible to take this lens onto FX/film body.
> >
> > F100, AF-S DX VR 18-200mm F/3.5-5.6G IF-ED, Fujichrome Sensia (RA) 100
> > @70mm
> > http://www.michaelphotography.net/others/IMG2948_18200_70F56.jpg
> >
> > @135mm
> > http://www.michaelphotography.net/others/IMG2949_18200_135F56.jpg
> >
> > @200mm
> > http://www.michaelphotography.net/others/IMG2950_18200_200F56.jpg
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|