John,
I have a Minolta Multi-pro that I like very much. I use it for mainly 6x6
and Xpan shots, almost all negative. With the "scanhancer" diffusion
material, it doesn't get as much problems with grain.
I didn't get the Nikon, as I heard too many complaints about the
point-source lighting. Nevertheless, a friend has one and gets fine results
as well.
Any more and you are in the Flextight area, or buying a used drum scanner.
Bill Pearce
----- Original Message -----
From: <om4t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 11:53 AM
Subject: [OM] medium format film scanners
>
>
> If anyone has experience with using a high end medium format film scanner
> I will appreciate whatever comments they might have to offer including
> info on the minimum computing power required to do justice to the scanner.
>
> In particular, someone has suggested that the Nikon Super Coolscan 9000 ED
> is worth considering.
>
> I know that this subject has been aired before and so to save list space
> taking up old news any off-list responses will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> John Hudson
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|