I think 180/2 will be much better since it contains ED glass & CA problem is
going to be improved.
--
Michael
On 09/03/2008, swisspace <swisspace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I Think the 180/2 works fine with the E jobbies and doesn't suffer from
> CA like some others e.g my tamron 80-200/2.8
>
> not good examples for CA comparing but I have posted quite a few picks
> the last couple of years taken with 180/2 and E-1 here are some
>
> http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/803266_25jCM#173535396
>
> http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/803266_25jCM#26943659
>
> http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/1935147_S37Ts#98071755
>
> http://thattimeoflife.smugmug.com/gallery/613944_WsNbX#38491004
>
>
>
>
> > has some CA especially at larger apertures. The Zuiko 180/f2 looks very
> > nice on Gary Reeses's site, though I can't recall seeing any photos
> >
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|