| Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better? |
|---|---|
| From: | Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Mar 2008 10:02:36 +0000 |
Hmmm, questionable taste in captions, in my view. The Hiroshima one is particularly tasteless, but then I suppose that's what the list is about. Chris On 7 Mar 2008, at 12:06, Jez Cunningham wrote: > Don't you wish we could still take pictures like these? > > http://listoftheday.blogspot.com/2007/09/great-olan-mills-photos.html > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Another oboy Hong Kong good guy, Larry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Test shots of Nikkor AIS 180mm F2.8 ED, Bernard Frangoulis |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Marc Lawrence |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |