Subject: | [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better? |
---|---|
From: | Marc Lawrence <montsnmags@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:11:37 +1000 |
Winsor Crosby wrote: > You can. Just photograph any of your spiked or shaved bald neighbors > with their giant tats, giant tees, cargo shorts and flip flops. The > advantage is that you will not have to wait 30 years for it to look > amusing. Up yours, Winsor. ;-) Cheers, Marc (joking, of course, and without any tats (yet)) Noosa Heads, Oz ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: OT: New backpack on the way, Bob Whitmire |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OT: New backpack on the way, Marc Lawrence |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, John Hermanson |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OT] Are film photos better?, Marc Lawrence |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |