----- Original Message -----
From: "Leandro DUTRA" <leandro.gfc.dutra@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> 2008/3/5, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> ...many OM Zuikos
>> performed very well edge to edge on the 4/3 including the 16/3.5
>> fisheye.
>
> Yes, but then they are not really the wide angulars they are in their
> original system, nor are they weather sealed or autofocus as digitals
> should be.
>
>
I don't think so, what important is coverage and focal length, a 16mm is a
16mm, it is a 32mm in 4/3, still a wide angle. Olympus can make such a small
25/2.8, that means AF is not the point for heavy and large.
>> > The difficulty is making them small and fast at the same time. Small,
>> > fast, wide, take two.
>>
>> I don't know where you got this information, I won't take this guess
>> without
>> technical support.
>
> I am just being empirical. I would be pleased to be contradicted
> empirically or technically, but so far nothing has came forth!
>
If your theory is right, my 5050's F1.8 lens must be very big, it's sensor
is samller than 4/3 and started at 7.1mm!
C.H.Ling
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|