Subject: | [OM] Re: FYI - E-420 |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:23:15 +0800 |
Why not? The N*kon 10.5mm F2.8 is only 305g. C.H.Ling ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernard Frangoulis" <lists@xxxxxxxxx> > Quoting Chuck Norcutt (5/03/08): > >>I think owners of the 7-14 would attest that the principle seems to work >>quite well. On the other hand, competing manufacturers seem to be doing >>quite well with a micro-lens solution. > > But the 7-14 is quite big... And even the 8mm is not small (79*77mm, > 485g). A "pancake" lens is not really required, but something small would > be nice. Would it be possible to make a 17/2.8 smaller than the 8mm? > > Bernard ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: FYI - E-420, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: FYI - E-420, James R |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: FYI - E-420, Bernard Frangoulis |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: FYI - E-420, Leandro DUTRA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |