And Aperture seems now to be able to read and import E-3 .ORFs
(hurrah!) although iPhoto does not.
More investigation needed.
Chris
On 4 Mar 2008, at 09:24, swisspace wrote:
> It is much better than the E-1 and good enough for my purposes, but
> then
> I don't need large prints.
>
> I am really enamoured with the E-3 and it will be welcome at my home
> for the foreseeable future, now I have the tools I need I had better
> get
> out and learn how to use them, rather than spend all my time on the
> internet looking for the latest upgrade - for me the E-3 is
> sufficiency
> as is my macpro and aperture.
>
> I wonder f it applies to cameras, but I once read an article in the
> American cycle magazine that said the more motorcycles you have the
> less
> you ride, having once owned 6 at the same time I can attest that
> this is
> true for motorbikes. In another article it talks about real bikes and
> defines any BMW as real bike because it works every day, I would class
> my 3Ti and E-1 as real cameras, the E-3 is too new to trust yet.
>
> I wonder what aperture can do with the raw files when they finally get
> around to finishing it.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|