Wasn't there a suggestion that the fast OM wide angles weren't as
good as their more modest, slower siblings on digital? (such as the
much praised 21/3.5)
Certainly, I've found my silver-nose 24/2 to be much softer than a
later 50/1.4 (1.07 mill. s.n.) in a studio situation, both stopped
down to F11 and 16, although I didn't do any rigorous testing.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 26/02/2008, at 9:30 AM, Tom Fenwick wrote:
> Some experiments with the E-3 and newly stabilised 21/2. After the
> 12-60 the c.a. is alarming although it seems to clear up ok in
> Lightroom. There is also noticeable barrel distortion, but there is a
> nice clarity to the files and it's close to the focal length I like...
>
> http://www.pbase.com/tom_77/fremont
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|