AG Schnozz wrote:
>> I think it's difficult to compare film and digital 'negatives'. We have many
>> choices of 'developer' for our RAW files. Imagine someone producing a RAW
>> file that was impossible to process unless you used their own RAW editor? It
>> may have worked for Kodachrome (RIP), but it would have a very short shelf
>> life in the digital world...
>>
> Sigma Foveon.
>
Is this the thread of the assumptions? Certainly a lot being made. The
SD9, SD10 and SD14 are supported by at least several and probably most,
RAW converters.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|