It's hard to see how the old version could be improved optically,
which is why I'm sticking with mine, but I was just curious as to what
you were actually comparing
I'm not a power AF guy, so the SWD version is lost on me. Anyway,
thanks for posting your test pics.
Joel W.
On Feb 18, 2008 8:28 PM, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yes, it is the non SWD version. But looking at the MTF and cross section of
> the lenses, both versions are the same optically.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joel Wilcox" <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 11:58 PM
> Subject: [OM] Re: OM Zuiko lenses on E series digital bodies
>
>
> >
> > On Feb 18, 2008 8:00 AM, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry, I have overlooked your question, to compare the the DZ and OM,
> >> here
> >> are some shots with DZ50-200 too:
> >
> > Is yours the older DZ 50-200? Thanks.
> >
> > Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|