Sorry, I have overlooked your question, to compare the the DZ and OM, here
are some shots with DZ50-200 too:
http://www.accura.com.hk/50200A100F28.jpg
http://www.accura.com.hk/50200A100F4.jpg
http://www.accura.com.hk/50200A50F28.jpg
http://www.accura.com.hk/50200A50F4.jpg
also a sample of 50/1.4 at F2.8
http://www.accura.com.hk/50mmF28.jpg
The DZ50-200 is an exceptional performer, it is hard to beat but in real
application you will not see big difference.
C.H.Ling
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Hudson" <OM4T@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> Is there any opinion on any observable differences in sharpness and
>> contrast
>> of digital images generated with dedicated Olympus digital lenses and
>> "top
>> performing" Zuiko film camera lenses such as the 90/2 and MIJ 50/1.8.
>>
>> If this topic has been raised in the past I apologise for asking the
>> question again.
>>
>> jh
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
