Subject: | [OM] Re: focus and ? about lens filters |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:24:45 -0800 |
Then it is not a filter, it is an optical element. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On / January 8, 2008 CE, at 9:44 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote: > Some lenses with rear filters like old fisheyes have to have a > 'normal' filter in position - the lens requires a piece of glass > right there for optimum performance. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: (OT) What will they think of next?, Ian Nichols |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: focus and ? about lens filters, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: focus and ? about lens filters, Bill Pearce |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: focus and ? about lens filters, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |