I would have a go at making a comparison, but I've sold my E-500 to my
son ... :-)
Chris
On 19 Dec 2007, at 17:47, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> I would like to second this. I think to get a credible answer to this
> question we need to have someone who has an E-3 and one the following
> -- E330, 400/410, 500/510 -- do a side-by-side comparison to
> illustrate whether the E-3 sensor holds highlight detail better than
> the other panny sensors. The Willing Kind Soul will need to shoot a
> scene of normal to high contrast with a SMALL number of highlight
> elements, like the keester of a duck in the sunshine on a river or
> something like that (i.e., not a snow scene nor a cave either).
>
> Chris B.? Anyone else willing and able?
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|