On Dec 19, 2007 2:18 AM, swisspace <swisspace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am happy with the extra creativity that the E-330 allows, however I am
> finding the dynamic range disappointing, particularily in the way it
> deals with highlights, I already have the compensation set to
> underexpose a bit but I am finding it doesn't handle the bright areas
> very well. (I always shoot raw).
>
> Maybe it is something I have set wrong, but now that a few of you have
> been using the E-3 how does it REALLY compare to the E-1 and E-330 in
> terms of quality
I would like to second this. I think to get a credible answer to this
question we need to have someone who has an E-3 and one the following
-- E330, 400/410, 500/510 -- do a side-by-side comparison to
illustrate whether the E-3 sensor holds highlight detail better than
the other panny sensors. The Willing Kind Soul will need to shoot a
scene of normal to high contrast with a SMALL number of highlight
elements, like the keester of a duck in the sunshine on a river or
something like that (i.e., not a snow scene nor a cave either).
Chris B.? Anyone else willing and able?
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|