Larry wrote:
> Especially since action photography sucked unbelievably worse in the
> days before whizbang tracking AF, and 10 frames a second. There just
> wasn't nearly as many amazing shots to justify spending thousands less
> on a camera that just has great IQ, but only at one shot per 1/3 or 1/5
> of a second - definitely not fast enough for excellent photography. Or
> focus would have to be done the decisive moment way - just not enough of
> this skill anymore to generate the best shots since it only takes money
> to get the better shots now.
You should go back to your Remington, Larry. These newfangled personal
computer thangs just aren't for you... ;-)
Garth
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|