I agree that the diagonal isn't terribly useful but I chose it since I
thought it was probably valid from a comparative standpoint and mostly
because it was a number available to me without unlimbering the
calculator. If you don't like my numbers you'll have to take them up
with Oly and Canyon. My numbers came from the manufacturer's specs.
The are, of course, just as accurate as the FL spec.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> Jan Steinman wrote:
>>> From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Granted,
>>> the 7-14 covers a wider angle at 7mm than the Canyon at 16mm but the
>>> difference is only 5% (114 vs 108 degrees on the diagonal).
>>>
> I didn't really pay much attention to Chuck's original post on this
> subject, unlikely as I am to buy either lens. Somehow, this post led me
> to plug the numbers into the AOV spreadsheet I worked up some time ago.
> My numbers differ a little bit. I don't know who is right. Mine are
> simple trig. calculations in Excel.
>
> On the diagonal, I get 114.5° vs. 107.0°, for a 7.0% difference. But
> the diagonal measure seems meaningless to me, especially with different
> aspect ratio sensors. Horizontally, it's 102.4° vs. 96.7°, for a 5.8%
> difference.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|