You should at least try a larger print or perhaps try cropping out a
relevant size piece and try it at 13x19 if you can easily make a 13x19
at home. Viewing a landscape is kind of like viewing a fractal image.
No matter how much detail you capture in the image there is always more
to be seen if you only had higher resolution. Where do you stop? Is it
sufficient to see individual trees, individual branches, individual
leaves, veins within the leaves, etc, etc. The decision about detail is
much easier with a portrait but no matter how much resolving power
you've got on some images it eventually isn't enough. Print it on
canvas so it looks like a painting. Then the lack of detail won't
bother you. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
Johnny Johnson wrote:
I'm first
> attracted by the subject/composition but after that I like to see
> fine details that "tickle" my eyes and draw me up close to examine
> them. If the fine details aren't there I feel that I haven't had a
> complete viewing experience - you might even say that I feel cheated
> in a way or at least disappointed. With my current camera I can
> print 13"x19" at ~240 ppi but I sure would like to try larger prints
> at a higher density. But, I'm a landscape type person and could care
> less about people pictures where too many details can certainly be a bad
> thing.
>
> Later,
> Johnny
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|