Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E-3 specs - specifically weight.

Subject: [OM] Re: E-3 specs - specifically weight.
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:17:02 -0400
I forgot.  It's also one stop faster at 2.8 vs. 4.

Chuck Norcutt

Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I understand why you like the 7-14 because of architectural shots in 
> tight quarters.  Since you already have the 7-14 perhaps you don't care 
> now about the new 16-35 II.  But the angular coverage on full frame is 
> only about 5% short of the 7-14.  The 16-35 II costs less, weighs less 
> and can also be fitted with a filter which the 7-14 cannot.
> 
> One of these days I'll get a pano head and try pano technique in tight 
> quarters.  Should be interesting.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> Jeff Keller wrote:
>> An E410 + 150/2 delivers the size/weight advantage of four thirds. It
>> is actually fairly easy to use hand held. Oly still gets most of my
>> money but the weight of their lenses limits how much they get. The
>> only thing amatuer about the E410 for my use is the lack of a MF/AF
>> switch.
>>
>> Unfortunately the fast D. Zuiko zooms are essentially the same weight
>> as the equivalent C*non. However the Zuiko 7-14mm was unique when it
>> came out and has easily more than paid back its cost for me. The C*non
>> 16-35 II looks to be quite competitive. The weight of the C*non L
>> glass has prevented them from getting any of my money for lenses so
>> far.
>>
>> Vote with your pocket book. If it is too big & too heavy, don't buy it.
>>
>> The list has migrated quite far away from OM. It probably won't be
>> long before only the occaisional new OM user seeking answers to
>> questions is the only thing keeping the list with any significant
>> Olympus content.
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>> On 10/21/07, Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> But a question (and no, I'm not trying to pick a fight here): since so
>>> many of you have pointed out the advantages of other systems, and the
>>> disadvantages of Oly's choices, have you all effectively abandoned Oly
>>> in your minds?  (Or in your purchase habits?)  It certainly sounds to me
>>> like you should, since there appears to be little in Oly's offerings
>>> that is of any appeal to you.
>>>
>>> So what say the assembled masses?  Are you simply here out of nostalgia?
>>>
>>>
>>> Garth
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>>
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz