| Subject: | [OM] Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad |
|---|---|
| From: | Dan Mitchell <danmitchell@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:16:01 -0600 |
Couple of shots with a low-serial-number 50/1.4 on an E-1 -- focussing is a bit hectic, because the dof is teensy, but the bokeh and "glow" are (imho) very nice. http://www.danielmitchell.net/sg/index.php?gallery=Baby/Jul_30-Sep_16&image=P9059494.jpg http://www.danielmitchell.net/sg/index.php?gallery=Baby/Jul_30-Sep_16&image=P9059531.jpg -- dan ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: All metal flash shoes, safe or not?, Don Holbrook |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad, Chris Crawford |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] [photos] Mount Greylock, Richard Lovison |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad, Chris Crawford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
