Well, in my studio the light is 99.99999% in control of the photographer
except the photographer is sometimes wrong. It's those pesky flashes,
you know. That why I have to consult with Dr. Flash from time to time.
Chuck Norcutt
Bob Whitmire wrote:
> Studio stuff typically is well-lit, is it not? Or at least the
> lighting is about 99.99999% under the control of the photographer.
> And please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't noise more of an issue
> in low and uncertain light rather than well-lit scenes? I seem to
> recall some criticisms of sample images showing remarkably low noise
> in some cameras where I know better <g>, the reason for low apparent
> noise being how well lit the scenes were. Of course we usually want
> the high ISO in low light, otherwise what's the point? Other than
> texture, etc. Is there a need for high-ISO when scenes, studio or
> otherwise, are well lit, other than the obvious motion freeze, etc.?
> I'm guessing aerial photogs, for example, might like to shoot high
> ISO in bright light just to be able to use _really_ high shutter speeds.
>
> --Bob, shutting up now because he's in _way_ over his head.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|