But the ISO range is identical to the 5D. But how it performs we've not
seen yet. But your characterization of it as a studio camera is
probably right on. Studio photographers (and no others) are
specifically mentioned in the Canon announcement.
Chuck Norcutt
Bob Whitmire wrote:
> My guess is that the pixels on the 22mp Canon _are_ "inferior" in
> some aspects to the pixels on the 5D. The two cameras have entirely
> different end uses. As I understand it, the 22mp Canon is not
> designed to be a high-ISO, low-light wunderbrick, but rather a studio/
> fine art wunderbrick where low ISO is more the norm. I seem to recall
> that earlier high MP Canons furnish more noise than the 5D.
>
> But then I don't pretend to be a gear-head, or even to play one on
> TV. <g>
>
> Me, I got my sights set on that new D3 Nikon. Now there's the promise
> of some truly bad-ass pixels! <wink>
>
> --Bob
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|