I'm trying yet again. Something is clipping the front of this message.
I'm trying yet again. Something is clipping the front of this message.
I'm trying yet again. Something is clipping the front of this message.
I'm trying yet again. Something is clipping the front of this message.
I'm trying yet again. Something is clipping the front of this message.
Chuck
Sorry, the original got clipped in the front somehow. Happens to me
once in a while but only on this list.
Chuck
Your logic on the repairability of the OM-4Ti is impeccable but,
unfortunately, incorrect. There are no electronic parts available
except from organ transplant donors. And those are in extremely short
supply since its the electronics which fail first. Stick with an OM-1n
or and OM-2/2n if you want a repairable camera. Lots of parts still
available.
Chuck Norcutt
Leandro DUTRA wrote:
> 2007/9/3, Darin <d.rhein@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Perhaps an OM-2s would be another, more affordable, option. This would give
>> her the choice of automatic or manual shutter speeds, and TTL support of her
>> T-20 flash.
>
> My worry is about electronics failing. We don't have the resources
> you have for repairs, and the OM‐2s is an old model. Thus I am
> considering the OM‐1n a better bet; if I wanted to risk electronics, I
> guess the OM‐4Ti would be a more complete and, being more recent, more
> repairable (is there such a word?) option.
>
> As for automation, she has an E‐510 already. So I guess the OM‐1n
> would be a nice, fully manual, counterpoint. Or a plain OM‐1. I
> gather they are cheap enough too.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|