Subject: | [OM] Re: E-510 IS effectiveness |
---|---|
From: | "Bill Pearce" <bs.pearce@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:38:56 -0500 |
Wouldn't his results be exactly what we would expect? After all, you already have an "advantage" with a 50 that you don't with a 500. I'm a little mystified about adding IS to something like a 28-100. Although I certainly would like to have the extra stop or so, it isn't a deal breaker to have it. Bill Pearce ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Mail order E6 processing, Jim Couch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Fwd: Media Release: New Canon EOS 40D Delivers Speed, Control an..., Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-510 IS effectiveness, Andrew Fildes |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-510 IS effectiveness, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |