'Tis lovely. I'm glad you're not so ambivalent about panos as to not
have posted this. I'd love to see a big print. I think my last attempt
at a pano may be a bust. I was shooting at about 135mm and (for reasons
unknown to me since I was on a tripod) I was shooting at f/5.6 and
probably should have been at f/11-16. Right side foreground is soft due
to insufficient DOF. Haven't decided if it's recoverable or not. Maybe
if I chop off one side. We'll see.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> geebee wrote:
>> Works for me too. Here are a few non OM shots to keep you going until
>> things pick up :-)
>>
> As long as Chuck hijacked my thread to comment on the desultory level of
> posts this beautiful weekend, when one hopes all in the No. Hemisphere
> are out taking pictures,and you hijacked that to post eight OT images....
>
> Here's nine non Oly images, but all stitched together so you only see one.
>
>
>
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Miscellaneous&image=MossBraeP116laz.jpg>
>
> I have very ambivalent feelings about panoramas. Neat idea and does the
> otherwise impossible without specialized cameras with motorized lenses.
> But how to display them? On the web, either so small vertically as to
> lose all sense of scale and detail or viewed a bit at a time by scrolling.
>
> I can print roll paper, so I can do a long print, but I sure better like
> it, with paper, ink, custom mat and framing costs.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
