Moose wrote:
> ...
> Here's nine non Oly images, but all stitched together so you only
> see one.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Miscellaneous&image=MossBraeP116laz.jpg>
> ...
> Even 1300 pixels wide is an 8x reduction from the original, so
> the incredible detail (the other advantage of panoramas) is lost.
> In the usual battle of sharpness vs. funny looking foliage, I
> went slightly toward softness this time.
It just slips outside the 1280 dimensions of my laptop, but I must go
look at it upstairs on the big monitor to do it better justice. Like
with many photos here, while it's wonderful as posted, the mind doesn't
do a bad job (even if still inadequate) of trying to fill in the details
on what it's like in its original birthday-suit skin. It reminds me of
some streams up in the Blue Mountains near us. I particilarly like the
splash of blue sky up in the top left. It's an image that naturally fits
the panoramic, without looking gimmicky-panoramic (like the Ken Duncan
photos I've seen way too much of).
Cheers,
Marc
Sydney, Oz
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
