>
> Indeed it is. Once you've got past the novelty that it's a complet
> non-photographic construct, what are you left with?
> A rather ordinary photo-realistic 'painting'.
> Cleverness is never quite enough somehow.
> Andrew Fildes
Yeah, definitely a good bit of craftsmanship, but was it worth the effort ?
It just looks like the sort of boring, empty of meaning type of photograph I
might take.
...Wayne
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|