Sorry, but that is not my experience. Perhaps I have been spoiled by
several years of using Leica and Canon L lenses, but I find the 14-42mm
to be a typical cheap kit lens: slow and with dubious optical quality,
especially at 14mm. I have ordered the 14-54mm from KEH; at least it is
faster and will give me a bit more range.
I suspect the site that gave this positive review never gives negative
reviews to anything...
Nathan
Moose wrote:
> Oops, should have also mentioned the lens review.
>
> http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/4383/lens-test-olympus-zuiko-digital-14-42mm-f35-56-ed-af.html
>
> Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
--
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands
*Opportunistic Image Acquisition*
General photography:
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
http://www.greatpix.eu
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Seville: http://www.frozenlight.eu/fotosevilla
Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507
Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS!
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|