If he has opted out of citizenship and has no intent to follow the
laws of a society for whatever reason, why doesn't Canada simply
deport him?
They no longer have any responsibility towards him by his own
definitions. Fine. Escort him to the border and wish him well.
Any border. If the neighboring nation won't admit him then he can set
up his colony in the transit lounge as a stateless person.
If they accidently admit him, they can keep him.
He owns land? So what. That's no guarantee of right of residency.
Shit, I'd hate to live next door to him. Peaceful or not.
Just imagine, a neighbor who considers himself beyond the law.
Any trivial neighborhood dispute would be a serious problem.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 24/07/2007, at 8:16 AM, tim.randles@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Robert Menard officially is persona non grata as far as the "state"
> is concerned, formally titled freeman-on-the-land, he is subject to
> neither state control and manipulation or their laws and statutes.
> he's an amazing fellow, living in peace, and taking on the Law and
> Courts in the process, and kicking their butts everywhere he walks.
> His latest is being able to have a "lawful excuse" (according to
> the criminal code of Canada!) enabling him to trod over the Legal
> Society and the laws of the Corporation of the Government of Canada.
>
> Plain and simple, he opted out of his citizenship, remains in
> Canada and has immunity from the laws of a Society he has no
> connection to. he asks questions like... can you name your
> society?, accountants have one, lawyers have one.. if we are
> members of a society, what is that societies name? we are not
> members of a society unless we VOLUNTARILY ACCEPT to be members
> and agree to abide by their statutes, rules and tax codes...
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|