What might also help is a scan which is not a jpg - a tif should be easier
to work with, and much easier to upsize. I upsized your 600dpi jpg to a
very satisfactory 100MB tif, but the jpg artifacts are very obvious.
Did I mention upsizing? There are some attractive discounts on SizeFixer at
present - www.fixerlabs.com
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of khen lim
Sent: 04 July 2007 12:07
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: 6x6cm contact print
On 04/07/07, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The 600 dpi scan is off a little, in that the bottom of the histogram
> is empty and it's almost squeezed against the top.
> Still, it's possible to make to a pretty good looking image.
>
> http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/KhenLim/House.htm
>
> The full size 600 dpi version is here.
> http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/KhenLim/House600dpiau.jpg
>
> It's not a finished product, but gives an idea of what's there. It
> would be easier with a bigger scan. There is probably no more detail,
> but working with it would be easier.
I did do a 1200dpi scan but the file size is horrific. If you think you
could work better with a 1200dpi file, maybe I can send it directly to you,
Moose. Let me know.
Thanks again. Appreciate you coming to my help. Dad would no doubt be
pleased. :)
K.
Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
--
"To sin by silence when we should protest makes cowards of people" - Emily
Cox
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
