Subject: | [OM] Re: E-410 vs E-510 and IS? |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:17:43 -0400 |
I found the comparison interesting. While not stated as such the comparison focal length of 31mm had to have been at a 35mm equivalent for each camera since the Panasonic only goes to 16.4mm at max zoom. Only the Minolta A2 and the Pentax K10D move the sensor. It's not a surprise that the A2 beats the K10D since it has a lot less mass to move. Since the 4/3 sensor is a bit smaller than the K10D the 4/3 should have a bit of an advantage on anti-shake... at least in theory. But 3 stops for the (relatively) large sensored K10D ain't bad at all. Chuck Norcutt Jeff Keller wrote: > Thanks that's interesting ... > > Trying to dig further turned up a reference to a piezo electric motion > detector and said it was refered to as a gyro detector (I always > thought a gyro detector had a spinning wheel not a mass connected to a > piezo electric crystal). > > I found a comparison of results at > http://www.neocamera.com/feature_stabilization_shootout.html ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Jessops winder for OM bodies, Piers Hemy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Contrast (OT, sorta), Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-410 vs E-510 and IS?, Jeff Keller |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-410 vs E-510, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |