Martyn
I think that the Balloon is fit to be seen; it's just different :-)
Chris
On 24 May 2007, at 12:35, Martyn Smoothy wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I agree the Balloon's not really fit to be seen but I liked the view
> (taken from my "study" window)...
>
> Just checked the EXIF data. I'm sure the difference is because of the
> light - the Balloon pic was taken in the evening when the light was
> failing - 1/500 at ISO 400 so more difficult to focus & hand hold.
> Both
> the bird pics were taken in bright light - 1/2000 at ISO 800.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|