Subject: | [OM] Re: What's a P1? |
---|---|
From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 7 May 2007 14:56:15 -0700 (PDT) |
> Of all the things that you can do, getting the 350 is hands down > the most important. Imagine panning using that lens. After all these years, there's one thing I've never had and that's a high-quality super-telephoto lens. Unfortunately, even the "lowly" 350/2.8 is still way beyond my price range. Some things I don't quite understand: It doesn't have autofocus. It doesn't have image-stabilization. It doesn't even have a Canon or Nikon mount. Why then does it remain astronomically priced? AG ____________________________________________________________________________________ TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: What's a P1?, Bill Pearce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OM-4 random light leak problem, Marc Lawrence |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: What's a P1?, Bill Pearce |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: What's a P1?, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |