Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: WTB : TTL Auto Shoe Cord T 0.6

Subject: [OM] Re: WTB : TTL Auto Shoe Cord T 0.6
From: "Michael Wong" <mialop@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:25:41 +0800
Moose,
Thanks for your opinion. I have Power Bounce Grip 2 & T32 But I think Power
Bounce Grip 2 is too heavy. I have a 3rd party flash bracket, simply I need
a PC cord to connect PC socket of OM-1n to T32 but it seems no Oly stuffs
achieve it.

I do understand there is no TTL for OM-1n but I need a "media" (cord) to
connect OM-1n & T32 for off flash other than applied Power Bounce Grip 2.

By the way, many thanks to all & I'll consider Autoconnector 4 & Auto TTL
cord T0.6. Thank you very much.


-- 
Michael

An Olympus OM system fans



2007/5/4, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Michael Wong wrote:
> > Yes, I want this one. Connection between shoe 4 & T-flash.
> Am I confused here? You are looking for an expensive, hard to find (and,
> IMHO, awkward to use) TTL shoe cord to fire a flash of fcamera with an
> OM-1n?
>
> You want to operate a T series flash with an OM-1n. The OM-1n does not
> do TTL. All it does is close a mechanical switch to fire a flash and
> have an extra contact to show the flash ready light in the viewfinder.
>
> The OM-1n also has a standard, dumb, PC socket on the front of the body.
> So if you want to operate a flash like the T32 away from the flash shoe,
> all you need is an adapter like the HAMA Chuck posted a link to. This is
> the solution Oly choose with the Bounce Grip2, which has a simple PC
> cord built-in (which hides in the bottom of the bracket when not in use)
> to connect with an OM-1(n).
>
> If you don't already have the T series flash and don't plan to get an OM
> camera with TTL in the future, you can save more money by using any
> generic auto flash with a PC cord. With the TTL cords, you are just
> paying a lot for extra connections to the flash that don't do anything.
>
> The one design flaw with the T32, and especially the T20, is that the
> flash tube is too close to the lens, increasing the incidence of
> red-eye. More conventional flash designs that raise the head further
> have less red-eye problem.  A flash like the Sunpak auto26SR, which is
> what I happen to have, is inexpensive and has tilt/swivel head with
> zoom, detachable PC cord (so it's not in the way when used on the flash
> shoe) and five step manual power control for the Dr. Manual Flash types.
> It's really a better technical match to the OM-1(n) than is a T32, with
> the exception of les WA coverage, 35mm vs. 28mm.
>
> I bought a T32 with my OM-2n many years ago, and find it a wonderful
> combination, but it's not needed for an OM-1(n).
>
> I do have a TTL Shoe Cord, for use with OMPC bodies, but I can't say I
> much like the way the stiff cord sticks straight up from the shoe
> connector. The Auto Connector 4 is a much nicer connection to work with.
> But I wouldn't use either one with an OM-1n.
>
> Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz