Actually, a T-32 claims coverage for a 24mm lens. I've never measured
the power output that wide but I think it's probably pretty optimistic.
By my measurements a T-32 is already down by 0.4 stops at the edge of
a 28mm field.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
A flash like the Sunpak auto26SR, which is
> what I happen to have, is inexpensive and has tilt/swivel head with
> zoom, detachable PC cord (so it's not in the way when used on the flash
> shoe) and five step manual power control for the Dr. Manual Flash types.
> It's really a better technical match to the OM-1(n) than is a T32, with
> the exception of les WA coverage, 35mm vs. 28mm.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|