Subject: | [OM] Re: FZ50 |
---|---|
From: | "Joel Wilcox" <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 2 May 2007 12:34:21 -0500 |
I see. Can you indicate an example of an ISO 100 capture that gives you said pain? Joel W. On 5/2/07, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't have any experience other than what's clearly illustrated right > here: <http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicfz50/> > > Chuck Norcutt > > Joel Wilcox wrote: > > Chuck, > > I didn't realize you had experience with any Panny P&S. You > > constantly surprise! > > > > Joel W. > > > > On 5/1/07, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Too bad that, at 1-1/8" sensor size Panasonic chose to go for 10MP > >> instead of a more rational number like 6. It pains me to see very clear > >> noise at ISO 100. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Downside years, was New Olympus Odyssey Pictures Posted, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Downside years, was New Olympus Odyssey Pictures Posted, Jez Cunningham |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: FZ50, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: FZ50, AG Schnozz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |